The contextual vulva

Research blogging on: Howarth H, Sommer V & Jordan FM. (2010) Visual depictions of female genitalia differ depending on source. Medical Humanities 36: 75-79.

stairwell of daily express by fionajay

 

Possibly my favourite work email I’ve ever written was the one to the head of IT, notifying her that, in the interests of science, I needed to access websites like pornhub.com and youporn.com. Here’s why:

The internet is an amazing resource for scientists in all manner of domains, one of which is human variation. You might think that after a hundred years of cross-cultural investigations of human diversity, and a much longer period of anatomical observations, we would have a fair idea of the variability in genital morphology. But this kind of information, like so much else to do with our bodies–and especially their sexual characteristics–is just not readily available.

Stemming from that, we asked the question: do visual depictions of female genitalia differ, depending on the kind of source they are from? Are the images that we see in medical textbook illustrations different in proportions from those seen in internet pornography? What about feminist “celebrations” of female anatomy? These are important questions, because we construct our ideas about the range of normal variation through experience, and if women express concern that their bodies are not “normal” in some way, then health professionals need to be aware of how “normality” is constructed. Spoiler: we found differences, as I’ll explain below.

This study was part of a wider project aimed at understanding variation and preferences regarding female genital morphology undertaken by Helena Howarth for her masters thesis at UCL, co-supervised by Volker Sommer and and myself. Only a few studies had measured actual female genitalia to try and get real-world estimates of the range of female morphology. Helena had the insight that readily-available internet pornography wasn’t simply a tremendous source of measurable variation, but that it might be a  contributing factor to our perceptions of normality.

Helena gathered a hefty amount of image data for her project, trawling through libraries, and finding internet images that she could take measurements from morphological landmarks – for example, the length of the labia minora, or the distance from the clitoris to the perineum. For my part in doing inter-rater reliability measurements, I can attest that this is about as far from “oh wow, surfing the internet for porn at work” as one can get.

What did we find? Two major things. First, that labial protuberance–how much the inner labial lips protrude from between the larger labia majora–was significantly less in the online pornography sample compared to that in the  feminist publications, with medical illustrations falling somewhere in between. Second, there was a less varied range in organ proportions in the pornography sample; all the measurements were highly correlated with one another, but this wasn’t the case in the other two sources.

What does this mean? As we stated in the abstract, there are public health implications:

Women and health professionals should be aware that specific sources of imagery may depict different types of genital morphology and may not accurately reflect true variation in the population, and consultations for genital surgeries should include discussion about the actual and perceived range of variation in female genital morphology.

It’s interesting that the feature we found that was most different (labial protruberance) is also the one that is most commonly requested in elective/cosmetic genital surgery. There has been a great deal of media attention paid to the rise in these surgeries in recent years, and responses that somewhat dismissively attribute this to fashion, unattainable body ideals or partner-pressure are not helpful. We suggested that it was important to explore how women arrived at their ideas about normality:

Genital variation is understudied, and we strongly encourage scientific and educational/artistic initiatives that promote clinical and popular understanding of the range of variation in genital morphology. Here, we were concerned with depictions in sources that may shape the perceived range of variation, therefore imagery samples are justified, but measurements of genital morphology should ideally be taken directly from life.

Some of those initiatives include the four great papers below; the work by the New View Campaign challenging the medicalisation of sex; and other public or online initiatives such as All About My Vagina, I’ll Show You Mine, Design-A-Vagina, amongst others I’ve surely missed (let me know!).

Here’s a link to the pdf of our paper. The journal, Medical Humanities, also published another paper by Shelley Wall on normativity in images of genitalia, focusing on intersex conditions, and both were featured in an accompanying editorial piece.

[1] Basaran et al. Characteristics of external genitalia in pre- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric (2008) vol. 11 (5) 416-421
[2] Lloyd et al. Female genital appearance: “normality” unfolds. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (2005) vol. 112 (5) 643-6
[3] Liao et al. Labial surgery for well women: a review of the literature. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (2010) vol. 117 (1) 20-25
[4] Schick et al. Evulvalution: The Portrayal of Women’s External Genitalia and Physique Across Time and the Current Barbie Doll Ideals. J Sex Res (2009) 1-9

The tasteful metaphorical picture above is actually the stairwell of the Daily Express building in London.

 

16 responses to “The contextual vulva

  1. Pingback: Slightly less interesting than numerals « Glossographia

  2. Hope this link to Jamie McCartney’s project of casting molds of vulva works: http://www.greatwallofvagina.co.uk/ (a previous bookmark for this was hijacked). Otherwise, look for the artist’s contact information here: http://jamiemccartney.com/ The art show lines up the finished plasters of the wide variety found of women’s genitalia. Show will be opening in the UK.

  3. Hey! Very interesting. That’s awesome that you guys published this work :)
    And congrats to Helena – who was in my Masters class :)

  4. As you might imagine, yours was the very second image that popped into my mind when I read the “In the Media” feature on the UCL homepage that began, “Demand for female genital cosmetic surgery…” http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/headlines/0811/24082011-pornography-and-rising-female-plastic-surgery

  5. But surely the BBC headline writer wins highest score from this study for putting the words “designer vagina” and “NHS” together in one headline. Next to a giant picture of a terrifyingly sharp-looking scalpel. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-14627659

  6. That is a bit Offtopic, but i thought you might give me an advice.

    With regards to registering and hosting a domain
    name, I have no idea what I need to do. A. Must
    I register and host at the same place? Or B. Should
    I register my domain name with one company and host it with another?
    I would prefer to do A, but therein lies my issue. I want to
    register my domain name with DD24, because I like
    their rates. However, I don’t want to host my site using them. What would be your decision?

  7. Superb blog you have here but I was wondering
    if you knew of any user discussion forums that cover the same topics discussed here?
    I’d really like to be a part of online community where I can get opinions from other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Bless you!

  8. I like what you guys are up too. This type of clever work and exposure!
    Keep up the superb works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to blogroll.

  9. Heya! I’m hoping you are able to answer my question. I’m interested in a high grade
    WP theme, however I have no idea how to know if the one I select is going to be
    compatible with mobile phones. What are some recommendations you can give me in regards to what to look for with regards to
    colors and background and details like that?
    I normally look at websites via my smart phone, and I’m going to guess that many people are just like me in that way. Oops, i went a bit off topic, sorry. Appreciated the article thou.

  10. With havin so much content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright violation?
    My blog has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my authorization. Do you know any methods to help stop content from being stolen? I’d truly appreciate it.

  11. I don’t know whether it’s just me or if everyone else encountering problems with your
    blog. It appears as though some of the text within
    your posts are running off the screen. Can somebody else please comment and let me know
    if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my browser because I’ve had this happen previously. Thank you

  12. We stumbled over here coming from a different web page and thought
    I might check things out. I like things i see so
    i am just following you. Look forward to finding
    out about your web page yet again.

  13. My developer is trying to convince me to move to .NET from
    PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses.
    But he’s keeps bothering. I’ve been working with Blogs Organizer on a variety of websites
    for about 7 months and i am concerned about switching to an alternative
    program. I have heard great things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer
    all my wordpress posts into it? Any help would be really appreciated!

  14. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your site. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to
    come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme?
    Great work!

  15. Good day! I know this is kinda off topic but
    I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this site?
    I’m getting fed up of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  16. That’s a bit Offtopic, but i assumed you could possibly give me some advice. With regards to registering and hosting a domain name, I have no idea what I must do. A. Must I register and host at the same place? Or B. Should I register my domain name with one company and host it with another? I would want to do A, but therein lies my problem. I want to register my domain name with NameCheap, since I like their fees. However, I don’t want to host my site with
    them. What would be your choice?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s